There are a lot of things I really like about American culture (understood broadly as “the way people do things”), and I think I have a fair amount of affinities with it, but there are also some things that I just don’t see myself doing. Such as, you guessed, the two things mentioned in the title.
For those who don’t know, brown bags are informal meetings at which everyone brings their lunch and listens to a presentation. Where I work, we have a lot of brown bags; it’s a research institution and at least twice a month outside researchers are invited to talk about their recent studies. People bring their food, everybody eats for about 10 minutes, and then the speaker starts his/her presentation while people continue to eat. Except for me; I eat before or after. I consider it disrespectful to stuff my face while someone is talking about their work :). I’ve been told that I’m too formal sometimes and, if that’s true, this would be an example, I guess.
Another reason I can’t do it is that I would be able to neither enjoy the food, nor concentrate on the talk. But, while this is a secondary reason with brown bags, it’s top of the list with business lunches or, lower on the formality scale, work lunches. I’ve been spared the blessings of doing business lunches since it’s not a requirement for the job. Whew! But I remember having to do a work lunch once, in an otherwise very friendly, collegial atmosphere. I ate before and went to the meeting to, well, work, since that was the purpose :). My colleagues asked me why I didn’t bring my lunch and I admitted that I wouldn’t have enjoyed it if I had eaten while working. (Mind you, I didn’t say I wouldn’t concentrate on work if I had to eat. No, my primary concern was enjoying my food :). To which one of them exclaimed, in an amused but admiring way, “how European!” It didn’t even cross my mind that it was such a big difference and I really didn’t mean to be obviously different, but the thought of eating while working, well, that just doesn’t sit well with my stomach :).
This would have been ok, but the difference turned out to be much bigger than it seemed. I did have to meet with someone for a business breakfast once. So, while the other two people I was meeting with, who were waaay more important than I, just nibbled on some insignificant crumbs of whatever, I treated myself to a nice cappuccino and a croissant :). It was on my dime, but when I realized the difference I felt utterly ridiculous. The importance I attached to enjoying good food was at least ten notches over theirs. I saw immediately what was going on but felt completely helpless. I was too immersed in my culture, my way of doing things, and just wasn’t able to concentrate on work more than on the food. That was my first job in the U.S. and my first business meal (so to speak), and I had no idea about this big cultural difference. But now that I know better, I’m relieved I don’t have to do business lunches :).
And, in the same vein, I’ll say that one of my major pet peeves is, naturally, to be interrupted for work issues when I’m having lunch. My boss choses to be particularly uninspired (to put it mildly) when he does that. I used to believe that my transparently unpleasant face would deter him from doing that but I’ve started to suspect it’s the other way round :). So from now on I’m going to close the door to my office (and I can consider myself lucky for having one) and eat while I’m reading The New York Times.
Funny how, just as I was contemplating writing this post, Oblia wrote on a similar topic, wondering how someone (the Romanian president, in this case) can train his stomach to eat when he’s perhaps not hungry. I have no idea how business executives and government officials do this day in, day out, but I think the word “train” is key here. I assume it takes discipline and that one eventually gets used to it. All I know, though, is that I want to enjoy my food :).